I THOUGHT Peter Heaton-Jones had finished writing his column, but, no, here he is again.

STFC is one of many businesses going through a hard time. As I see it, the board did what any business in administration does, it negotiated terms to enable it to continue in business, so all creditors were paid a percentage in the belief that it was better to have something rather than nothing.

Is that any different to the Government battling out, for instance, Railtrack, for that was Government money, i.e. yours and mine, Peter.

It is hoped that the systems now in place at STFC will enable the business to go forward and maintain another piece of Swindon history, when so much is being lost.

Yes, only a small proportion of the town regularly attends matches but only a small proportion attends other sporting venues in the town. Although I enjoy football, I would not argue against helping any of these other groups if they were in trouble.

I do not see any wrong in negotiating a settlement to enable people like myself to continue to see the sport I love. I happen to believe that the town will benefit from the council's action in writing off the money owed after negotiations.

I contribute a lot to many things in Swindon I never use, but I don't moan about it. They are there for me to use should I so wish.

So please Peter, as you obviously do not like football, go and see whatever it is that you like, and hope that whatever it is, it remains viable, for if it ever needs bailing out I am quite sure your tune would change.

Finally Peter, although the sum involved was a bit steep, have you also worked out how much per head of population it actually is? And did you know it was not long ago when rates were inflated to cover the cost of unpaid rates from residents in the town is that any different?

HARRY FITCHETT

(A confirmed Town fan)

Perrys Lane

Wroughton