PEOPLE living at the top of the David Murray John Tower have demanded to know the radiation levels emitted from the forest of communications equipment on top of the building.

Concerns over possible health risks were raised by chairman of the residents committee Bob Barrett, who lives on the 20th floor of Swindon's tallest building, just feet from mobile phone relay masts and police transmitters.

And despite calling for written assurance six weeks ago, the residents say they have received nothing from Swindon Borough Council, which owns the town centre high rise.

Mr Barrett, 45, a facilities manager who has lived in his two-storey apartment on the top floor for 14 years, said: "I noticed about 18 months ago that my television and radio reception seemed to be a bit faulty. There was interference with my signal.

"At first I did not take any notice, but then a friend said it could be caused by radiation coming from the towers. I have lived here for years and have no idea how safe these aerials are, but they are just a few feet above us.

"All wewant is a written assurance that we are living in safe conditions. Is that too much to ask? The fact that we are still waiting for that confirmation is a real cause of concern."

Mother-of-one Sarah Prouse, 19, lives on the top floor with her partner, telephone sales executive Ben Edwards, 21, and six-month son Harry.

She said: "It is a worry that the council has not been able to assure us that the radiation levels are safe.

"Young children are more vulnerable to radiation than adults. I need to know that we are not at risk."

The issue is the latest in a long line of complaints about the general running of the building, which was once regarded as the most luxurious council accommodation in the borough.

Concerns range from jerky lifts, servicing of fire equipment and ineffective heating, easy access by trespassers and people using the resi- dents' access as a toilet.

Councillor John Taylor (Lab, Central) who has long championed the residents' cause said: "There is an array of aerials and masts. The residents are right to be concerned about their health, especially when there is a sign warning them of aerials.

"We understand that the management company employed by the council, Donaldsons, has not responded to the request for reassurance. The delay only feeds suspicions.

"One would think the contractors would have taken readings to ensure that the people living nearby would be safe. And if this was done it would be documented.

"I feel it is a shame that there is a lack of progress towards resolving complaints. I have to say it feels like wading through treacle."

Part of the problem, he explained, is that responsibility for the tower is split between departments.

"I have arranged to speak to senior housing, financial and planning officers to ensure that real progress is achieved," he said.

Swindon Council spokeswoman Sarah Deacon said: "We have been working constructively with the tenants and have been meeting regularly with them. There are no identified risks but we are investigating as part of our procedure.

"We are in the process of getting written confirmation for them."