PLANS to redevelop a major site in Melksham could have hit yet another stumbling block.

Developer Charles Tull's proposal to build houses on the former GEC factory site in Beanacre Road could be jeopardised because planners have made no provision for housing.

In March, town councillors voted to back Mr Tull's plans to build a 133-unit development, with possible access to a new train station and a Bath-style Circus of homes, but this is looking increasingly unrealistic.

They are now calling for the developer to come up with more realistic proposals to transform a major gateway to the town.

On Tuesday, in another round of discussions, civic leaders met planners from West Wiltshire District Council to discuss the problems. Cllr Sarah Cardy, who attended the meeting on Tuesday, said: "The old district plan and the emerging district plan does not allow for housing on the site.

"It has been earmarked as a site of opportunity for employment and industry."

"I remember when the GEC site closed and for 15 years we have been looking at what is going to happen with the site.

"The ball is now in the court of the developer who has to bring forward appropriate plans which fit in with policy decisions."

Mr Tull from Box refused to comment on his next move but has already ruled out an industrial use for the land. He said developers could not be swayed into locating their business in the town because of a lack of demand.

Last year, the developer's dream to turn the site into a multi-million pound designer discount store were shattered when more than 300 retail and leisure businesses rejected a move to the site.

This was just one of a long line of setbacks which have plagued the re-development of the land. The dilapidated factory building has been used as a warehouse for the last 12 years.

Cllr Vic Oakman, who is frustrated by the continuing planning wrangle, said: "Something needs to be done because it is a rag, tag and bobtail of a site. It is a major site in Melksham and we want something done quickly."

The district council has yet to make a recommendation on what they feel would be best for the site.

A spokesman said: "We are still negotiating.

"Policy plays a major part in any application, so if land is earmarked for a particular use this could have an affect."