A joint hunt master and a terrierman pleaded guilty to interfering with a badger sett today after they caused the "most severe" damage an RSPCA officer had seen in 25 years.
Stuart Radborne, 29, of Abbotswood Farm, Bromham, and Ben Pethers, 29, of Hoopers Pool, Southwick, were caught 'waist deep' in the sett after frantically excavating it to try and find a lost terrier called Jimmy.
Members of the public suspected them of illegal hunting and alerted the police and the RSPCA.
They were charged with the badger sett attack and jointly charged with breaching the Hunting Act along with Jonathon Seed, 54, the former master of the Avon Vale Hunt, and two other hunt staff, Paul Tylee-Hinder, 58, of Quemerford, Calne, and Josh Charlesworth, 18, of East Tytherton.
But today, at North Wiltshire Magistrates Court in Chippenham, the RSPCA dropped the hunt charges after Radborne and Pethers pleaded guilty to interfering with a badger sett.
Outside court Mr Seed, re-elected a Conservative Wiltshire Councillor for Seend in Friday’s elections, condemned the RSPCA prosecution as a "complete outrage" and a "disgrace".
Mr Seed, 54, of Chittoe Heath, Bromham, said: "It has been a complete outrage and I would hope that every single member of the public think as to whether they give their hard earned money to the society in order to waste it.
"The RSPCA has spent £50,000 pursuing this and they have been given £500 in costs. It is an absolute disgrace.
"The two members of our group who pleaded guilty to interfering with a badger sett is an unfortunate event but they were going after their dog and the sentence reflected the judge’s view."
District Judge Simon Cooper heard that on March 6 2012 the five men, who were out hunting, were alerted that their dogs had marked a fox in a nearby field.
Radbourne and Pethers, who were riding on a quad bike, reached the area first and began to assess the situation.
The court was told the inexperienced terrier, Jimmy, escaped, ran off and disappeared.
The huntsmen located the dog in the set after they heard barking from below the ground.
They tried to use a location collar to pull him out but when that failed they began digging at the ground to free him, the court was told.
Jeremy Cave, prosecuting, said: "An onlooker saw the men digging in the sett and describes the digging as furious with soiling flying.
"The police and the RSPCA turned up and the men were questioned.
"There had been considerable interference with the set, digging and filling in the entrances. In total there were 15 entrances to the sett, 11 of which had been blocked.
"RSPCA Inspector Ian Burns, who turned up at the site, described it as 'the worst find he has ever witnesses in his 25 years of being an inspector'."
He added that Radbourne had been seen by another onlooker waist deep in the sett digging.
The traumatised terrier eventually resurfaced two hours after it had first become stuck, suffering deep cuts and puncture wounds to his neck and face.
The RSPCA had originally brought charges against all five huntsman of breaking the Hunting Act ban, but decided to drop the cases after accepting Radbourne and Pethers guilty pleas.
Mr Seed, Mr Tylee-Hinder, and Mr Charlesworth, of East Tytherton, all denied any wrong-doing.
Clive Rees, defending Radbourne, told the court: "It was certainly a badger sett and it was accepted that he had been the one who was up to his waist in it and he took full responsibility for that.
"But it was out of concern for the terrier.
"Mr Radbourne accepted his responsibility from the beginning. Seeing it was an active badger sett made him even more concerned about Jimmy."
Janet Gedrych, for Mr Pethers, said her client had accepted that it was "reckless" to let Jimmy free.
"It was clear that Jimmy had escaped and it was reckless to allow the dog out of the cage before fully investigating," he said.
"He accepts that he was digging in an effort to find his dog, he didn't intentionally set out to damage the sett but he acted recklessly to find his lost dog."
District Judge Cooper handed the pair a £300 fine and ordered them to pay £250 costs and a £15 victim surcharge.
He told them: "In my mind the main aspect of this case was a failure to control Jimmy.
"Reliable or not, he should have been kept in his box. He got out and disappeared down the sett.
"Why he did it is speculation, but that he should have been allowed to do it was wrong. You are both responsible and you both could have prevented it."
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article